《威尼斯商人》读后感莎士比亚作为英国文艺复兴时期最杰出的艺术大师，被马克思称之为“最伟大的戏剧天才”。莎翁的作品几乎是个悲剧的世界，《罗密欧与朱丽叶》千年传唱流了千年的泪水；《哈姆雷特》一个快乐王.的忧郁又何尝不震憾了一大批人……但他的喜剧也同样值得一读再读。
莎翁的名剧《威尼斯商人》探求的是金钱这一古老而又永不过时的话题。金钱是世界上最有价值的东西么？有什东西比金钱更珍贵？富有动人的亲情故事，对.与付出的讴歌、机智的对话、峰回路转的剧情，夸张爆笑的情节，充满了传奇及浪漫的色彩。交织着友情、.情、亲情的世界，引领我们认识什么才是人生中重要的价值……诙谐的语言蕴含了深刻的内涵！
剧中主要人物有安东尼奥、夏洛克、巴萨尼奥、鲍西亚、杰西卡和罗兰佐。他们生活在商业味浓重的威尼斯，安东尼奥热心帮助巴萨尼奥去见美貌的富家嗣女鲍西亚而向放钱的夏洛克借了三千块钱，并依夏洛《威尼斯商人》读后感克的立下了违约割胸口一磅肉的契约。安东尼奥的全部资本都在“海上”，他的商船因故未能及时返回，于是夏洛克一纸状书把他告上法庭。法庭协调未果，因为不怀好意的夏洛克不要巴萨尼奥三倍甚至十倍于借款的`还款，只要那一磅肉。法庭审判中，鲍西亚女扮男装出场作为律师用自己的博学使夏洛克打消割肉的念头的同时拿不回借款的一个.儿。更要命的是，他的所有财产都依法传给“私奔”的女儿杰西卡和女婿罗兰佐。
不说夏洛克贪婪得到头来一无所有，且看鲍西亚父亲为宝贝女儿择亲定制的金、银、铅三个匣.，匣.里面分别是死人的骷髅、傻瓜的画像和鲍西亚画像。
金匣外面刻着：“谁选择了我，将要得到众人所希求的东西。”，里面的纸卷是：“发闪光的不全是黄金，/古人的说话没有骗人；/多少世人出卖了一生，/不过看到了我的外形，/蛆虫占据着镀金的坟。/你要是又大胆又聪明，/手脚壮健，见识却老成，/就不会得到这样回音：/再见，劝你冷却这片心。”
银匣外面刻着：“谁选择了我，将要得到他应得的东西。”，里面的纸卷是：这银.在火里烧过七遍；/那永远不会错误的判断，/也必须经过七次的试炼。/有的人终身向幻影追逐，/只好在幻影里寻求满足。/我知道世上尽有些呆鸟，/空有着一个镀银的外表；/随你娶一个怎样的妻房，/摆脱不了这傻瓜的皮囊；/去吧，先生，莫再耽搁时光！”、铅匣外面刻着：“谁选择了我，必须把他所有的一切作为牺牲。”，里面的纸卷是：“你选择不凭着外表，/果然给你直中鹄心！/胜利既已入你怀抱，/你莫再往别处追寻。/这结果倘使你满意，/就请接受你的幸运，/赶快回《威尼斯商人》读后感转你的身体，/给你的.深深一吻。”
看到这里我们不得不对鲍西亚父亲的睿智喝彩。其实，匣.反映的不仅是世人对金钱的看法，更是对一切事务的看法，金银铜只不过是个比喻罢了，里头的纸卷本身就是很好的诠释。
现实生活中，我们看事物、评价人物不要只凭外表。金玉其外的橘.还不是败絮其中么？一些富家.弟也只会穿金戴银却是不学无术的。所谓真人不露相啊，真正人才不必包装入时，也不一定夸夸其谈。“发闪光的不全是黄金”，这话没错，我同样想到有关金.的一名话：“只要是金.终究是会发光的”。这就要我们擦亮双眼，分清是内在金还是外在金了。
现实生活中，我们做事不要虚浮。一步一个脚印，实打实的才能成事，_、浮夸风吃的就是这个苦头，高产决不是吹出来的。教学工作也是一样，投机取巧，做小动作，看起来风风火火的教学活动未必就是件好事。
《威尼斯商人》告诉我如何看世界，如何做事情，求真务实是我们坚持的原则。
《威尼斯商人》这本书主要反映出夏洛克的贪婪和鲍西亚的机智，同时也表达出了当时人们对犹太人的歧视。
我觉得夏洛克其实本性不坏。他是在遭人辱骂的环境下，成了心狠手辣报复心极强的人，在别人眼中就更加低贱卑微。当他发泄对xxx的不满时，我对夏洛克感到同情。
夏洛克把自己逼得太坏，太狠毒，竟以法律为由，想割下安东尼奥的一磅肉置他于死地，连几倍钱的赔偿都不肯接受，要知道他可是嗜钱如命的老家伙啊!当女儿杰西卡与罗兰佐私奔时，他最舍不得的不是女儿，不是自己的亲骨肉，而是那些与杰西卡同去的财物。
文中的'鲍西亚非常勇敢、冷静、睿智，在法庭上，她和侍女尼莉莎装成法官和记录官，装作为夏洛克辩护，她沉着冷静，一面赞同夏洛克的观点，一面给他反悔的机会，又一步步将他逼向绝境，在夏洛克一切准备就绪，刀尖就要刺向安东尼奥的胸口时，鲍西娅趁机提出不能流一滴血、不能与一磅有毫厘之差，否则就以异邦人企图以直接或间接手段谋害公民罪致罪。
夏洛克心虚、害怕底气不足，最终无奈依法改信xxx，一半财产充公，另一半给了受害人安东尼奥，确保了性命的安危。而安东尼奥，不仅无罪释放，逃出危机，还得到了财产。
《威尼斯商人》是莎士比亚早期的喜剧作品。安东尼奥和夏洛克是两个对立的人物形象，他们对待金钱和人情的态度是截然相反的。安东尼奥是人们理想中的商人，是所谓的“商人王子”、慷慨仁厚、放债不取利息、珍重友谊、不惜为之牺牲生命。而夏洛克爱钱如命、惟利是图、受到损害就要加以灭绝人性的报复。对他贪婪的金钱欲和残忍的报复心，莎士比亚显然持否定的态度。
从人文主义立场出发，莎士比亚认为像安东尼奥那样的`商人可以消除资产阶级的矛盾，建立人与人之间被金钱破坏的自然关系，实现美好的生活。而夏洛克那样的资本商人，重利盘剥、损人利己，则是社会矛盾的根源，美好生活的破坏者。但在另一方面，莎士比亚对夏洛克作为犹太人受到的歧视和欺辱又怀有同情。
这个世上有各种各样的事物，很多事物虽然外表十分美丽，但实际上确是很丑陋的，很多富家公子外表金光灿烂，但实际上却是不学无术。有一句话说的好“会发光的不一定是金子，但是金子总会发光的。”我们要学会分辨是非黑白，不要被事物的表面所迷惑。许多事情的表面现象往往是虚假的，仅仅是为了迷惑我们，我们要学会透过表面看本质。所以，在爱情和友情面前，金钱也只剩淡如水的痕迹了。
世界文豪莎士比亚是一位伟大的戏剧家、诗人、作家，它拥有两本非常著名的作品，分别是：《莎士比亚悲剧集》与《莎士比亚喜剧集》。今天，我就太讲讲《莎士比亚喜剧集》中的一个故事——《威尼斯商人》。
在很久以前，在威尼斯有两个非常有钱的商人，一个是夏洛特，一个以高利 贷为生的人，另一位叫安东尼奥，一位热心肠的`，又大方的商人。有一次，安东尼奥把所有的资金都投入了海上的商船，可是，他的朋友巴萨尼奥要成婚了，向他借钱。(我前面说过了安东尼奥没有钱了)因为他没钱，无奈，只得向夏洛特借钱，夏洛特定了一张契约：若不定时还钱的话，那就有权利从安东尼奥的身上割下一磅重的人肉。
还钱的日期已经到了，而夏洛特却一定要人肉，不要钱于是鲍西娅(巴萨尼奥的妻子)来充当律师，发现了其中的破绽：上面只写了人肉，并没有写可以割下血。于是，安东尼奥就得救了，按威尼斯的规定，夏洛特一定要将所有的财产充公一半收入国库，一半分给安东尼奥。不久，海上的商船有凯旋归来。
善有善报，恶有恶报。人与人之间，老天是公平的，公证的，大家都把坏的看在眼里呢!以后，我要更善待我的朋友们!
In fact, I don't think Sherlock is the winner of his life, but he may not be quick enough to be wise or not ruthless. At the end of the event, who is more ruthless than Sherlock does not want to cut meat, but is it not allowed to allow people to die? I'm Sherlock's words. OK, I'll go and cut it and see if I accidentally die, I'll lose my life again. When my knife was only a centimeter away from Antonio's heart, women would have compromised, and the repayment scheme was even more profitable for Sherlock, who had negotiated the initiative. But in fact, Sherlock first encouraged him, but he could not help it. He could only kneel on the ground and beg for forgiveness, so he lost. Just like two people tug of war, people who are discouraged at the crucial moment are injured more.
In a word, this story is not a simple _base friend, an intelligence wuner_. It is more integrated into the background of the times and reacts to the religious and ethnic conflicts of the time. We often fall into the rut of _the author has a position_: since it is not a simple story about wisdom and justice, is it that Savon is ordinary for the Jews? Maybe neither of them. I think it is more in a story, the real reflection of the social life system, history, culture and the existence of oppression, discrimination, praise of good, and also face their own evil, impartial, to convey that _people and things in society are good and evil intertwined rather than black and white._ On the other hand, the setting of _Antonio and babanho is a base friend_, which is implied by many ambiguous details, further confirms that _the character is grey_, because in medieval Europe homosexuality is a serious crime that should be hanged. Under the system of value at that time, such a setting conveys that the protagonists, who appear to be at the height of moral integrity, are also criminals who are inferior in morality.
Let's talk about this one. I despise him from the bottom of my heart. Although his aristocracy did not keep his wealth, he had always relied on Antonio, even his wife's money, and then mortgaged his best friend to his enemy for marrying his wife, a man who wanted his life all the time, and made such a defeat with a grand reason, friendship, alas. Family friend, Antonio, you are still from Sherlock. Though he is dregs, he is sincere. He only wants your life and no wife. Then he took the money to marry the beautiful and rich Baocia with their money, but the tragedy was that Portia was still very smart, which helped him but also buried a time bomb for their relationship. Then Antonio had an accident, and he took his wife's money to save his friends, and finally he saved his friend by his wife. Completely empty handed white wolf, no way, who is handsome? He vowed to Portia that if the ring had left his finger, his life would not exist, and then he turned the ring out for Antonio's salvation, and again, did Savon imply that all the oath was unbelievable? I don't know if Baocia can live happily with a man like such a man, and don't know if she will live in an uneasiness every day, or she will ask Antonio to make a guarantee to make a vow. It's not happy.
Sherlock is not a positive character, but he dares to fight. As his classic Accusation: Jews, like Christians, eat the same food, breathe the same air, are cold in winter, hot in summer, stabed by swords and bleed, humiliation and resistance. Imagine if a Jew had hurt a Christian, the consequences were self-evident. Therefore, Sherlock will start the idea of revenge, but it is also reasonable. To be exact, I think this movie is more like a group of fellow bullies trying to bully a lonely old man. The daughter and the enemy eloped, the property was confiscated, the religious belief was also asked by Antonio to convert to Christianity, and the white - haired old man finally lost his previous game in the court. At the end of the film, when the door of the Judaism church was closed slowly, the gaunt figure was left wandering outside. At this moment, my heart sore suddenly. For the Westerners of the supremacy of faith, there is nothing more punishing than the stubborn Sherlock, and nothing is worse than that. Different Venice businessmen, different Sherlock. In the same plot, the same characters will experience different feelings after experiencing more experiences at different ages.
